Library

T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad v. Union of India (Supreme Court, 12 Dec 1996)

'Forest' is to be understood in its dictionary sense, and includes any area recorded as forest in government records, whatever the ownership.

Court judgment / order12 Dec 1996

One of the most consequential orders in Indian land law. It is an order in continuing proceedings, so it is labelled here as part of pending proceedings rather than a final judgment.

Case note

Material facts
Continuing public-interest proceedings on forest conservation across India.
Issue
How the expression 'forest' and 'forest land' in Section 2 of the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 is to be understood.
What was decided
The Act applies to all forests irrespective of ownership or classification. 'Forest' is to be understood according to its dictionary meaning, covering all statutorily recognised forests; 'forest land' also includes any area recorded as forest in government records irrespective of ownership.
Order / relief actually given
Directions included that non-forest activity in any forest needs prior Central Government approval, and that States constitute expert committees to identify forests.
Later proceedings
Reaffirmed as the governing position pending challenge to the 2023 amendment (Ashok Kumar Sharma v. Union of India, interim order of 19 Feb 2024).